RSH_small.gif (2703 bytes)

Radiation, Science, and Health
is an international non-profit organization

 

Radiation, Science,
and Health, Inc.

[Home Page]

About RSH
>Brochure
>
Organization, Board, and Members
>
Program Documents

RSH and Other Documents
>RSH Data Documents

 

France: Academy of Medicine; Dec 4, 2001 Statement on Radiation Health Effects

American Nuclear Society - Position Statement #41[PDF 46KB]"Health Effects of Low Level Radiation," June 2001

Center for Nuclear Technology and Society at WPI
Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Report by the Mass. Governor's Advisory Council on Radiation Protection
3rd Edition, March 2002


4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature


Abelson, P. H. (1994). "Risk assessments of low-level exposures [editorial] [see comments]." Science 265(5178): 1507.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature

Alvarez, J. L. and F. A. Seiler (1996). "New Approaches to Low-Dose Risk Modeling." Technology: J. Franklin Inst. 333A: 33-51.
Topic Number(s): 2.6.1 Cancer/Leukemia; 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature

Cohen, B. L. (1997). "Problems in the radon vs. lung cancer test of the linear no-threshold theory and a procedure for resolving them,." Health Phys. 72(4).
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Paper Summary/Data: [Summary]

Johnson, T. E. and H. Bruunsgaard (1998). "Implications of hormesis for biomedical aging research." Hum Exp Toxicol 17(5): 263-5.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]

Liu, S. Z. (1996). "Radiations risks: Threshold or no threshold?" Chinese Medical Journal 109(2): 99-133.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Paper Summary/Data: [Summary]

Liu, S. Z., Y. C. Zhang, et al. (1996). "Thymocyte apoptosis in response to low-dose radiation." Mutat Res 358(2): 185-91.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]

Loken, M. K. (1983). "Low level radiation: biological effects." Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 19(3): 175-202.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]

Luckey, T. D. (1991). Radiation Hormesis,. Boca Raton, FL., CRC Press,.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature

Masse, R. (2000). "Rayonnements ionisants: Exposures at low doses and biological effects of ionizing radiations." Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie 323(7): 633-640.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]

Sugahara, T. (1994). "Radiation paradigm and its shift." J Radiat Res (Tokyo) 35(1): 48-52.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]

Teeguarden, J. G., Y. P. Dragan, et al. (1998). "Implications of hormesis on the bioassay and hazard assessment of chemical carcinogens." Hum Exp Toxicol 17(5): 254-8.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]

Teeguarden, J. G., Y. Dragan, et al. (2000). "Hazard assessment of chemical carcinogens: the impact of hormesis." J Appl Toxicol 20(2): 113-20.
Topic Number(s): 1.2.1 Non-linear dose-response (“hormesis”): a general biological condition; 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]

Thomas, R. G. (1995). Radiation is not always harmful to human health,. ANS Trans. 72: 6.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature

Vasilev, G., A. Bayrakova, et al. (1997). Low doses - A real problem for radiation protection and radiobiology or a semantic crossword, . IAEA-TECDOC-976, IAEA-CN-67/95, , 141-142.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Paper Summary/Data: [Summary]

von Borstel, R. C. (1995). "Review of "Health Effects of Low Level Radiation," by S. Kondo." The Quarterly Review of Biology, 70: 250-252.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature

Walinder, G. (1987). "Epistemological problems in assessing cancer risks at low radiation doses." Health Phys 52(5): 675-8.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature; 5.0 Low Dose Radiation Research and Programs Misrepresent or Suppress the Data
Paper Summary/Data: [Summary - Section 4.0]
[Summary - Section 5.0]

Wolff, S. (1992). "Failla Memorial Lecture. Is radiation all bad? The search for adaptation." Radiat Res 131(2): 117-23.
Topic Number(s): 3.2 Animal/Organism Biology Studies; 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Web Abstract/link: [PubMed]
Paper Summary/Data: [Summary - Section 3.2]
[Summary - Section 4.0]

Yamamoto, O., T. Seyama, et al. (1998). "Oral administration of tritiated water (HTO) in mouse. III: Low dose- rate irradiation and threshold dose-rate for radiation risk." Int J Radiat Biol 73(5): 535-41.
Topic Number(s): 4.0 Conclusions by knowledgeable scientists rejecting the LNT: from the scientific literature
Paper Summary/Data: [Summary]

 

For more information please contact the RSH President Jim Muckerheide

For website problems please contact the Webmaster
 

Google Scholar