RSH Index Page
RSH > Correspondence > GAO Report-Letter to Domenici Nov. 3, 2000

RSH letter to Sen. Domenici advising that the June 30, 2000 GAO 'Radiation Standards Report' is Misleading

November 3, 2000

P.O. Box 843, Needham, MA 02494
Telephone: 781-449-2214
Fax: 781-449-6464
Email: rad_sci_health@comcast.net
jmuckerheide@dwww.radscihealth.org

November 3, 2000

Senator Pete V. Domenici
328 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3101

Subject: GAO Radiation Report is Misleading

Dear Senator Domenici,

We strongly support your LNT challenge. But GAO did not properly assess the data that show:

NO science supports, and voluminous data refute, the LNT. (E.g., Jake Spalding's LANL work.) GAO says there’s evidence “on both sides.” But NCRP-121, 1995, states:

“Few experimental studies, and essentially no human data, can be said to prove or even to provide direct support for the concept … It is conceptually possible, but with a vanishingly small probability, that any of these effects could result from the passage of a single charged particle, causing damage to DNA that could be expressed as a mutation or small deletion. It is a result of this type of reasoning that a linear non-threshold dose-response relationship cannot be excluded.” (emphasis added)

If LNT were true, or adverse effects existed at 5-10 rem, they would be readily seen, in 100s of millions of medical patients; millions of workers; and in high natural radiation areas. (Note that BRPS said background varies by more than a factor of 100.)

Government agencies misrepresent data to support the LNT. See, e.g., "DOE Misrepresents the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study," attached. See also, EPA's Federal Register response to its Scientific Advisory Board on setting radium limits, that states:

“…use of the dial painter data requires either deriving a linear risk coefficient from significantly non-linear exposure-response data, or abandoning EPA policy…” [which they refused to do].

We expected your request to cause substantive reviews of data and allegations of agency misrepresentations. GAO failed to assess the data. It did not engage knowledgeable critics for input. GAO now seems complicit. Will government ever review the data? To include/address the critics?

We again urge that your staff query the agencies, and GAO, on specific data and allegations.

 

Regards, Jim Muckerheide                        Dr. Theodore Rockwell, Vice President
President                                                        3403 Woolsey Drive, Chevy Chase, MD 20815

Attachment: DOE Statement Misrepresents the Nuclear Shipyard Worker Study

Cc: Senator Murkowski, Representative Sensenbrenner, Comptroller General Walker

Independent Individuals Knowledgeable in Radiation Science and Public Policy

Committed to Change Radiation Science policy in the Public Interest

 

RSH > Correspondence  > GAO Report-Letter to Domenici Nov. 3, 2000
 

For more information please contact the RSH President Jim Muckerheide

For website problems please contact the Webmaster
 

Google Scholar

07/01/06