Another article: Cancer is an
accumulation of failure of repair
by Jim Muckerheide
August 14, 1998
The following article appeared
in the New York Times. It reports on a paper in the Aug 15, 1998 magazine
"Science."
It states:
"When BRCA1 is defective,
it is unable to repair oxidative DNA damage, the most common insult to the genetic
material of cells throughout the body...
"An accumulation of genetic
damage to the DNA is how overexposure to sunlight can cause skin cancer and an overdose of
radiation from X-rays can cause cancer in internal tissues like the thyroid gland. When
oxidative damage occurs in genes that determine cell growth and when the mechanism that
normally repairs such damage fails to work properly, the cell is no longer able to keep
its growth in check and a malignant tumor results."
|
New
York Times: August 14, 1998
Study Finds How Gene's
Defects Cause Breast Cancer
By JANE E. BRODY
Scientists
at the University of North Carolina have made an important discovery about how defects in
one of the two breast cancer genes, BRCA1, raise the risk of the disease: They leave cells
without the normal ability to correct certain mistakes that commonly occur in their
genetic machinery.
Scientists and experts elsewhere say the finding has potentially
important clinical implications for people known to carry the defective gene in their
cells. On the one hand, it could result in more effective treatments for hereditary breast
cancer. It could also lead to a test that would predict which of the women and men who
carry the defective gene are most likely to develop cancer.
On the other hand, the new understanding raises questions about the
safety of starting at a young age to do regular mammograms in women who inherit the
defective gene.
The new information, reported in Friday's issue of the journal Science,
will add to the understanding of how cancer starts and what might be done to prevent it.
The lead author of the study, Lori Gwen, a graduate student, said, "This is the first
direct evidence of a function for this tumor-suppressor gene, and it helps to explain how
the gene may be involved in cancer."
The study, done in specially altered cells derived from a mouse, showed
that the BRCA1 gene directly or indirectly participates in a process called
transcription-coupled repair, a rapid means of correcting mistakes that occur in the DNA
of other genes.
When people make a mistake writing with a pencil, they use an eraser,
on the typewriter they use white-out and on the computer, the delete button. When an error
occurs in the DNA of a gene, cells rely on an error-specific repair mechanism to knock out
the errant information.
In Friday's report, Ms. Gowen, Dr. Steven Leadon and colleagues report
that the normal task of BRCA1, one of the two genes known to be involved in hereditary
cancers of the breast and ovary, is to repair DNA damage caused by oxidation, a process
that occurs continually in the body in the course of normal metabolism and that can also
result from exposure to outside agents like radiation.
When BRCA1 is defective, it is unable to repair oxidative DNA damage,
the most common insult to the genetic material of cells throughout the body. A defective
BRCA1 gene is responsible for about 5 percent of all breast cancers and can affect men as
well as women in families with hereditary breast cancer.
An accumulation of genetic damage to the DNA is how overexposure to
sunlight can cause skin cancer and an overdose of radiation from X-rays can cause cancer
in internal tissues like the thyroid gland. When oxidative damage occurs in genes that
determine cell growth and when the mechanism that normally repairs such damage fails to
work properly, the cell is no longer able to keep its growth in check and a malignant
tumor results.
There are already several other cancers that have been linked to genes
that have lost their ability to repair defective DNA. Skin cancers commonly occur in
people with the rare hereditary disorder, xeroderma pigmentosum, after exposure to
sunlight. Another is a
rare hereditary form of colon cancer, hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, or Lynch
syndrome, in which a defective repair gene fails to correct a mismatch in the DNA.
Dr. Bert Vogelstein, a cancer geneticist at Johns Hopkins University
who unraveled the defect involved in the colon cancer gene, said that someone who carried
a defective BRCA gene started out with both a normal and a defective version of the gene
in each cell. But when a particular mutation occurs in the normal BRCA gene in breast or
ovarian tissue, the pace of DNA repair changes from that of a sprint to a slow crawl. This
allows mistakes to accumulate that may eventually result in the uncontrolled growth of a
tumor.
But Vogelstein also suggested that an inability to rapidly repair
oxidative damage might prove to be a tumor's Achilles heel and lead to new improved
therapies. The defect suggests, he said, that these tumors "are likely to be
extremely sensitive" to therapeutic radiation or to chemotherapy drugs that cause
oxidative damage. Tumor cells would be hit harder by such treatment than normal cells,
which would still have one normal copy of the BRCA gene that could correct oxidative
damage induced by the therapy.
Leadon, a molecular biologist who studies how damaged DNA is repaired,
suggested another benefit: the possibility of determining who has a defect in BRCA1 that
"would lead to an inability to carry out oxidative repair." He said that
"BRCA1 is a very large gene that probably has multiple functions and can have
mutations that are not important." Leadon added that the new finding "will help
us determine which mutations are important," which could eventually lead to a test
that revealed who would be most likely to get cancer.
But Dr. Henry Lynch, an oncologist and expert on hereditary cancers at
Creighton University in Omaha, Neb., suggested that the new finding could prove to be
"a double-edged sword of Damocles." Lynch said that if a woman known to carry
one defective BRCA1 gene was subjected to repeated mammograms, say, starting at the age of
25, the X-rays would help detect an early, more curable breast cancer, but at the same
time the cumulative exposure to radiation might increase her risk of developing a cancer.
|
NOTES:
The fact that oxidative DNA damage and repair, and the
role of failed or overwhelmed repair mechanisms, are the cause of cancer, continues to
dramatically accumulate.
The idea that an incidental "hit" by radiation,
with normal background radiation levels, 1 mSv/year, causing 10 Million times fewer
damage events than normal oxidative metabolism damage (with causing 30,000 damaged
DNA in each cell at any time, being repaired at a repair half-time of 5 to 45 minutes), is
a stochastic event that can lead to cancer, is further confirmed as a false foundation in
the biology of cancer and the role of ionizing radiation in an increase in cancer at high
doses.
With the evidence of stimulation of repair mechanisms by low-dose
radiation, the biological basis for beneficial effects (e.g., the reduction in breast
cancer in the Canadian fluoroscopy study at low dose rates, vs the inceases in high-dose
exposures, along with the massive literature on the evidence of such biological and health
effects, that were arbitrarily dismissed as "anomalies") is becoming
increasingly grounded and undeniable in hard data.
I would appreciate any comments on the Science article by those who
review it. |