RSH Index Page
RSH > Documents > BRPS Docs > RSH Statement
previous.jpg (4111 bytes) next.jpg (3566 bytes)

RSH Statement of Principles to the Conference:

The Bases Required to Develop a Consensus on Low-Dose Radiation Health Effects; and Radiation Protection Policy

RSH Input to, and Handout at, the BRPS Conference

Dec. 1-5, 1999
Airlie House,
Warrenton, VA
USA

P.O. Box 843, Needham, MA 02494
Telephone: 781-449-2214
Fax: 781-449-6464
Email: rad_sci_health@comcast.net
jmuckerheide@delphi.com

December 2, 1999

Bridging Radiation Policy and Science
Airlie House
Warrenton, VA
December 1-5, 1999
 

Jim Muckerheide
Low-Level Radiation Health Effects Committee,
    American Nuclear Society
Center for Nuclear Technology and Society at WPI
Mass. State Nuclear Engineer
Mass. Governor’s Advisory Council on Radiation
    Protection

Low Level Radiation Health Effects Science: Animal and Human Studies

Whereas:  Substantial confirmed studies contradict the linear no-threshold hypothesis (LNTH), specifically for chronic, low-dose-rate, exposures; and low dose fractionated x-rays.

Whereas: NO substantial confirmed studies that should confirm the LNT do so, for, e.g., significant natural and medical diagnostic doses. (And some studies that claim to support the LNT misrepresent the data - subject to "scientific misconduct"findings.)

Low Level Radiation Health Effects Science: Molecular and Cellular Biology

Whereas: Low-level radiation (LLR) stimulates immune functions in "immunologically whole" animals and humans, while higher doses depress these functions; and suppressed background radiation causes adverse health effects, equivalent to essential nutrients.

Whereas: LLR-stimulated immune functions improve health, and prevent and eliminate cancer, and current low-dose radiation (LDR) immunotherapies eliminate some cancers. (Radiation protection research policy to ignore such results is responsible for millions of deaths to premature cancer, plus other adverse health effects, and unjustified costs.)

Low Level Radiation Health Effects Science: Natural Radioactivity Sources

Whereas: Natural radioactivity variations far exceed "cleanup" limits (with no adverse effects, and evidence of beneficial effects). E.g., future Hanford releases to the Columbia River (millions of times lower than 1946-1975 releases, resulting in trivial doses) are billions of times below natural river basin radioactivity. (Misrepresenting the hazard defrauds the public of $100s billions; and causes premature cancers and other consequences.)

- over -

Independent Individuals Knowledgeable in Radiation Science and Public Policy

Committed to Change Radiation Science policy in the Public Interest

 

The "Bridge to Radiation Policy" is to:

Affirm: That sub-ambient radiation causes adverse health effects, by shielding, K-40 removed from natural potassium, etc.; that large epidemiological studies with significant well-known doses result in null or beneficial results at low doses, contradicting the LNT; and that enhanced immune, enzymatic, physiological, and tumor-suppression exist in "immunologically whole" organisms, in human patients, workers, and the 60Co-exposed Taiwanese residents.

Affirm: That radiation protection-funded/controlled radiation research be redirected to health and medical research institutions; Apply LDR to clinical trials and life-saving interventions in advanced cases, and provide valid information to the medical community and the public, and; Optimize radiation supplements and delivery modalities to prevent/cure cancer and other diseases.

Affirm: Conduct rulemakings to incorporate LLR health effects data; Redirect "cleanup" funds to only imminent health and safety hazards pending revised standards, and; Reengineer radiation technologies.

Affirm: Investigate studies that misrepresent data for "scientific misconduct," including official reviews that fail to include all relevant data, and; Identify the costs of defrauding the public ($100s billions in direct costs that provide no public health benefit, and for premature cancer deaths, and other adverse health consequences).

 

 


RSH > Documents > BRPS Docs> RSH Statement
previous.jpg (4111 bytes) next.jpg (3566 bytes)

For more information please contact the RSH President Jim Muckerheide

For website problems please contact the Webmaster
 

Google Scholar

07/01/06