• RSH seeks to change public policy in the public interest.
• This site provides examples of the extensive science data.
• It advocates for appropriate research and policy changes. 

Government agencies suppress data, including radiation hormesis, and foster radiation fear.  They support extreme, costly, radiation protection policies; and preclude using low-dose radiation for health and medical benefits that apply hormesis, in favor of using (more profitable) drug therapies.

Wasted public costs/funds exceed US $ 1 trillion, for NO public health benefits.

• Radiation limits are as low as 0.1% of just the variation in natural background radiation
  (requiring massive public funds).
• This causes millions of premature deaths (vs. funding public health benefits- hormesis).
• It constrains low-dose radiation applications (including medical therapies to prevent and treat cancer, infections and inflammatory conditions, and other diseases).

The extensive data are not adequately considered by the primary radiation protection bodies and radiation researchers funded by the government agencies. Contrary to extensive data in whole organisms, they presume that low-level radiation causes adverse health effects linearly down to zero dose - the "linear no-threshold" (LNT) presumption.  This presumption is also discredited by current knowledge of biology and carcinogenesis.

This partial data summary is continuously updated.  Thousands of experiments that contradict the LNT are documented.  Extensive efforts by Dr. T.D. Luckey, Dr. Sohei Kondo, and many others, have "compiled the data" and refute claims that data support the LNT.  These are voluminous data sources. They contrast with the very few, poor, and even technically biased, "studies" that are misrepresented to justify the LNT in order to foster public fear, and to support costly radiation protection and medical therapy policies.